Robert Kiyosaki, best known as the author of “Rich Dad Poor Dad”, has publicly addressed critics who questioned his statements about Bitcoin purchases. The dispute began after Kiyosaki made remarks on social media suggesting he had stopped acquiring Bitcoin once the price reached around $6,000. Critics argued his record was inconsistent with earlier public comments that implied ongoing accumulation at much higher price levels. The disagreement centers on how his statements were interpreted and whether those interpretations constitute misleading or inaccurate claims.
Kiyosaki responded by clarifying his focus and intent. He explained that the reference to “$6,000” was meant as the price level or strike cost of his Bitcoin holdings, not the specific date he made purchases. In his words:
“To the person who said I was lying that I bought Bitcoin at $6000…. I know my strike price not the date he falsely accuses me of the date I bought Bitcoin on. Why would he care what date I bought it on? Does he have a personal agenda for calling me a liar?”
According to Kiyosaki, critics are placing undue emphasis on the calendar date of acquisition rather than the broader investment thesis. He stated that the precise date of purchase holds little relevance compared with the long-term value of the asset. In his view, a focus on timing obscures the essential point of his investment approach, which he frames as accumulation of real value through tangible assets and digital store-of-value instruments.
Several commentators noted that Kiyosaki’s recent statements appeared to contradict his social media posts from earlier months. Those posts encouraged investors to continue buying Bitcoin, gold, silver, and Ethereum even as prices fluctuated and, at times, reached historically high levels. Critics highlighted these earlier messages as evidence that he had not ceased buying, challenging Kiyosaki’s claim of stopping at lower price benchmarks.
Kiyosaki maintains that acquisition dates are largely irrelevant to his overall strategy. He emphasized that he would still add to his positions if prices revisited lower thresholds such as $6,000 for Bitcoin. According to his recent posts, he will continue to build positions in gold and has concrete plans to purchase silver coins regardless of specific pricing dates. For example, he wrote:
“I don’t know today’s date. It doesn’t matter.”
This episode exposes a broader philosophical divide between Kiyosaki and some segments of the online financial community. Kiyosaki prioritizes long-term accumulation of assets he considers hedges against inflation and fiat currency risk. Bitcoin, precious metals, and other alternative assets feature centrally in his stated strategy. He frames the debate as one of investment mindset rather than technical accuracy about timing.
Supporters of Kiyosaki’s approach argue that focusing on short-term metrics like transaction dates misses the larger point of his advocacy: building wealth through exposure to assets that preserve value over decades. Detractors, however, see his mixed messaging as potentially confusing and inconsistent, especially for less experienced investor trying to interpret his guidance.
In summary, Kiyosaki’s response to criticism reinforces his preference for an analytical focus on long-term value over specific chronology. He rejects accusations of deceit about his Bitcoin buying history and asserts that critics are misplacing their concern on secondary details rather than substantive investment principles.
